Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2021-08-11 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a score of 90.6, which is much better than the Moto Z3's overall score of 77.6. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Fold 3 has an older 11 version and Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie. Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a incredibly newer and a bit thinner phone than the Moto Z3, although it's much heavier.
Moto Z3 has a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a way smaller screen and a way lower resolution of 1080 x 2160, it also counts with a quite better pixels density. Moto Z3 features more storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a bit superior processing unit than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a larger amount of RAM. The Moto Z3 takes much better photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, and although they both have a 12 MP camera, the Moto Z3 also has a larger camera aperture to take better images in low light environments.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a really longer battery performance than Moto Z3, because it has a 47 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.