Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-11 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LTPS |
| 372 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has an overall score of 90.6, which is better than Motorola One 5G Ace's general score of 81.6. Although the Galaxy Z Fold 3 and the Motorola One 5G Ace were released with only a couple of months difference, Galaxy Z Fold 3's construction is much thinner but also way heavier. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a bit faster CPU than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 and Motorola One 5G Ace feature really similar screens, because although the Motorola One 5G Ace has a bit smaller display and a little bit worse 1080 x 2400px resolution, it also counts with a just a bit better count of pixels per inch in the display. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a bit bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Motorola One 5G Ace features a way better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a much bigger aperture to take better low light photos and video and a way more mega pixels camera in the back. The Motorola One 5G Ace counts with a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.