Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-11 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Blue and Brown |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has an overall score of 90.6, which is much better than Motorola One Vision's 80.7 global score. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 body is extremely newer and much thinner than the Motorola One Vision's, but it's much heavier. The Motorola One Vision counts with a little bit better looking display than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2520 pixels resolution and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a quite greater screen pixels density.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a bit better processor than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has more RAM. The Motorola One Vision features a slightly better storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 512 GB.
Motorola One Vision features a much better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a lot bigger camera aperture and a camera in the back with a much better resolution. Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with superior battery lifetime than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 4400mAh battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.