Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-11 | 2019-09-05 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a score of 90.6, which is better than Motorola One Zoom's 80 score. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 body is newer and notably thinner, but also way heavier than the Motorola One Zoom. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a bit faster processor than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Motorola One Zoom features a display that's very similar to the screen in Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although the Motorola One Zoom has a little smaller display and a way worse 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, it also counts with a just a little better display pixel density. The Motorola One Zoom counts with a much better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a much larger camera aperture to take better images and videos in poorly lited situations and a back facing camera with lot more megapixels.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a bit bigger memory for games and applications than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 128 GB more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features just a bit longer battery life than Motorola One Zoom, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.