Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a global score of 90.6, which is a bit better than Motorola razr (2020)'s general score of 87. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3's design is newer and somewhat thinner than Motorola razr (2020)'s, although it is heavier. Both of these phones come with the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't notice any difference regarding that.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a bit sharper display than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a little less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a larger screen and a lot better 1768 x 2208 resolution. Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a bit better CPU than Motorola razr (2020), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 and the Motorola razr (2020) both count with extremely similar storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos, both of them have exactly the same 256 GB internal memory. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a really longer battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 57% greater battery size.
Motorola razr (2020) shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a lot larger aperture to take better low-light photography and videos and a back camera with a lot better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.