Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2021-07-29 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 372 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.7 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a global score of 90.6, which is better than the Nokia XR20's general score of 80.8. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a way thinner and a little bit lighter phone than Nokia XR20, although they were released with only 0 months difference. Both phones in our current comparison include the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't perceive any difference regarding that.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a bit better performance than Nokia XR20, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has more RAM memory. The Nokia XR20 counts with a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per screen inch.
Nokia XR20 has a slightly bigger storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Nokia XR20 takes a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a bigger aperture for better low-light captures and video and a camera with a way higher resolution.
The Nokia XR20 counts with a bit superior battery life than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has 4630mAh of battery capacity against 4400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.