Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Sonic silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a general score of 90.6, which is much better than the nubia Red Magic 5S's 76.2 overall score. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a newer and thinner phone than the nubia Red Magic 5S, but it is somewhat heavier. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a newer 11 version while nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10 version, so it offers a couple nice extra features and some performance improvements.
The nubia Red Magic 5S features a bit sharper screen than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little greater pixels amount in each inch of screen. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a bit faster processing unit than nubia Red Magic 5S, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The nubia Red Magic 5S shoots much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a larger aperture and a back camera with way more mega-pixels. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a much bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity.
Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.