Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-08-11 | -- |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | $ 230.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G68 MP2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 7.7 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a score of 90.6, which is much better than Galaxy A16 5G's 76.2 general score. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 design is somewhat thinner but much heavier than the Galaxy A16 5G. Both phones in our current comparison include Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Fold 3 has an older 11 version and Galaxy A16 5G has Android 14 version.
Galaxy A16 5G has a bit sharper screen than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a lot lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit greater pixels count per display inch. Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a very superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has 8 GB more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A16 5G features a greater memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds up to 1000 GB. Galaxy A16 5G counts with a bit superior battery life than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4400mAh.
The Galaxy A16 5G features a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a way more megapixels back-facing camera and a bigger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.