Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 7.7 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 3 is better than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, with a 90.6 score against 79.9. Both devices in our current comparison use Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Fold 3 has an older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a noticeably older and incredibly heavier cellphone than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, but Samsung managed to build it extremely thinner anyway.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a little smaller screen and a lot worse 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, it also counts with a just a bit higher count of pixels in each inch in the display. The Galaxy A25 5G features more memory for games and applications than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 1 TB.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a lot better performance than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy A25 5G shoots much better videos and photos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a bigger aperture for better photography and video in low light environments and a back camera with lot more megapixels.
Galaxy A25 5G counts with a little longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.