Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52s is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, having a 91.1 score against 90.6. Both devices in our current comparison come with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so both of them should give identical OS features. Galaxy A52s's design is notably thicker but extremely lighter than the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, and both were only released 1 months apart.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s features a bit better display than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a bit smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a bit higher screen pixels density. Galaxy A52s has more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A52s, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a much more MP camera in the back and a larger camera aperture for better low light photos and videos.
The Galaxy A52s has just a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.