Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-08-11 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 3 is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A70, having a general score of 90.6 against 76.9. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 body is a lot newer and somewhat thinner, but heavier than the Samsung Galaxy A70. These devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Fold 3 has 11 version and Samsung Galaxy A70 has Android 10 version, providing some extra features.
Galaxy A70 features a screen that is very similar to Galaxy Z Fold 3's display, because although the Galaxy A70 has a little bit smaller display and a little lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per display inch. The Galaxy A70 has just a bit more memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a bit faster processor than Galaxy A70, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 takes much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy A70, although it has a lot smaller aperture which is not so good for low-light captures and videos.
Galaxy A70 has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.