Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-08-11 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 5G has a general score of 93.6, which is a little bit better than Galaxy Z Fold 3's score of 90.6. Although the Galaxy S10 5G is a lot older and somewhat thicker than the Galaxy Z Fold 3, it's construction is still way lighter. Both phones we compare here have the same Android 11 operating system.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy S10 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has more RAM. The Galaxy S10 5G has a little bit better display than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel count in each display inch and a little higher 1440 x 3040px resolution.
Galaxy S10 5G features a greater camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, and although they both have a back facing camera with a 12 megapixels resolution, the Galaxy S10 5G also has a lot bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photography in low-light situations. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 and the Galaxy S10 5G feature extremely similar memory capacity to install games and applications, they have equal internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy S10 5G features a bit superior battery performance than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 4400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.