Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 has a score of 94.8, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3's 90.6 score. Samsung Galaxy S20's body is incredibly lighter than the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, but it is somewhat thicker and was released only 17 months before. Both phones in this comparison use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S20 has 13 version and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has Android 11 version, so it counts with a couple nice extra features.
Galaxy S20 has a processor that's just as good as the processor in Galaxy Z Fold 3, they have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM amount. The Galaxy S20 has a much better display than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher pixels density and a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px.
The Galaxy S20 features a greater storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S20, because it has a 10% more battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S20 takes way better photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, and although they both have the same resolution camera in the back, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has a larger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.