Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a global score of 98, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3's general score of 90.6. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is an older and incredibly thicker phone than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, but Samsung managed to make it lighter anyway. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has 13 version while Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has Android 11, giving a couple additional features.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 both count with incredibly similar processors, they have 8 cpu cores and the same RAM amount. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features just a bit better display than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher 1440 x 3200px resolution and more pixels per inch in the display.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G shoots much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a much more MP camera and a larger aperture to capture better low light captures. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a greater storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features just a little better battery duration than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a 14% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.