Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 7.7 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 10.6 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 6.24 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has an overall score of 90.6, which is much better than the Galaxy S5 Sport's 77.8 overall score. Both phones we are comparing here use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has an older 11 version and Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2 version. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 construction is a lot newer and notably thinner, but also much heavier than Galaxy S5 Sport.
Galaxy S5 Sport features a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a really smaller display and a lot lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with a greater number of cores and a larger amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a way better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport also has a way higher resolution back-facing camera. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with much more storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 240 GB more internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a really longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.