Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-11 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a general score of 90.6, which is better than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's general score of 75.8. Galaxy Z Fold 3's construction is a lot newer and extremely thinner than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's, but it's incredibly heavier. Galaxy S7 Active counts with a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a way smaller screen and a bit lower 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution, it also counts with way more pixels per screen inch.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and a larger number of faster cores. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a little longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh. The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active takes greater videos and photos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, and although they both have the same resolution back-facing camera, the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active also has a way larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.