Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-08-11 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 372 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.7 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, getting a score of 90.6 against 80.1. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is just a bit heavier than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, it's a lot thinner and also newer. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has the older 11 version and Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a much better looking screen than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a bit worse 1440 x 2560px resolution and a lot smaller display, it also counts with a much better pixel number per inch of screen. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has just a little better performance than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal memory. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4400mAh.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, and although they both have the same resolution back facing camera, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a much larger diafragm aperture to take better captures and video in low light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.