Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is slightly better than the Galaxy Z Fold 3, having a score of 92.3 against 90.6. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G's body is incredibly lighter than Galaxy Z Fold 3, but it's thicker and was released about a year before. These devices use the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so both of them should offer the same OS features.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2636 resolution and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch of display. Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit superior processor than Galaxy Z Fold 3, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a greater camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, and although they both have a 12 MP resolution back facing camera, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a larger aperture. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with as much storage capacity to store more games and applications as the Galaxy Z Fold 3 one, both have exactly the same internal storage capacity.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 has superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.