Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-11 | 2017-04-05 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Black, Blue and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 7.7 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is much better than Xperia XZs, having a global score of 90.6 against 77.2. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3's construction is incredibly newer and notably thinner than the Xperia XZs's, although it is way heavier. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a bit superior CPU than Xperia XZs, because it has more RAM memory and more cpu cores.
The Sony Xperia XZs counts with just a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a really smaller display and a much lower resolution of 1080 x 1920, it also counts with a little bit better amount of pixels per screen inch. Sony Xperia XZs features a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a back camera with way more megapixels and a larger camera aperture to take better low light images and video.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Sony Xperia XZs, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a very superior battery performance than Xperia XZs, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity instead of 2900mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.