Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 11 | Android 5.1 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2015-06-16 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 5.64 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a score of 90.6, which is better than Xperia Z4v's 78.8 global score. Galaxy Z Fold 3's body is much newer and extremely thinner, but way heavier than the Xperia Z4v. These devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a more recent 11 version while Xperia Z4v has Android 5.1, giving you lots of additional features.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a little faster processing unit than Xperia Z4v, because although it has doesn't have an extra GPU, and they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also counts with more RAM memory. Sony Xperia Z4v counts with a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a quite lower 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a much greater display pixel density.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Sony Xperia Z4v, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory. Xperia Z4v shoots way better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a lot higher 20.7 MP resolution camera and a larger camera aperture.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a superior battery lifetime than Sony Xperia Z4v, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.