Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2021-04-20 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.32 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Citrus Yellow, Mint Green and Truffle Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit, 5 nm (Quad-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 642 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4250mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is slightly better than the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite, getting a 90.6 score against 85. These phones use the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so both of them should provide the user the same operating system features. Even though Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 and the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite were only released 4 months apart, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 design is extremely heavier but also a little thinner.
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a quite greater pixel density. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a much bigger storage for apps and games than Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite, because it has more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a little bit better processing power than Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite, because it has a larger amount of RAM and more CPU cores. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a bit superior battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite has a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a much better resolution camera in the back and a larger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.