Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2021-03-29 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.47 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 8.25 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Ceramic Black and Ceramic White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 516 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (1920 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 8.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has a general score of 90.7, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3's score of 90.6. These devices come with the same Android 11 operating system. Even though the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 were released only a couple of months apart, the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra construction is lighter but way thicker than the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a little bit better processing power than Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra counts with a way better looking screen than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution and a better amount of pixels per inch in the display.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 and Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra have very similar memory for applications, games, photos and videos, both have the same internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra counts with a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a 14 percent bigger battery capacity. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra takes much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a lot higher resolution back-facing camera and a bigger camera aperture to capture better photography and videos in low-light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.