Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 89.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-11 | 2021-05-31 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 6.91 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Celestial Silver, Cosmic Black and Frosty White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4520mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a global score of 90.6, which is slightly better than the Xiaomi Mi 11i's 89.5 score. Even though Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 and the Xiaomi Mi 11i were released with only 2 months difference, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 body is thinner but incredibly heavier than the Xiaomi Mi 11i.
The Xiaomi Mi 11i has a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a bit smaller display and a quite lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch of display. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a very superior memory to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Mi 11i, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a bit superior processor than Xiaomi Mi 11i, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a greater amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Mi 11i counts with a bit superior battery performance than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a 3% larger battery size.
Xiaomi Mi 11i captures a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a bigger camera aperture to take better photos in low light situations and a camera in the back with a way higher 108 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.