Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-08-11 | 2019-06-17 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Carbon Black, Flame Red and Glacier Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a score of 90.6, which is better than Xiaomi Mi 9T's overall score of 82.2. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a a lot newer and extremely thinner cellphone than Xiaomi Mi 9T, although it is also extremely heavier. Both phones in this review use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a newer 11 version and Xiaomi Mi 9T has Android 10 version.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a bit more powerful processor than Xiaomi Mi 9T, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has more RAM memory. Xiaomi Mi 9T counts with a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the screen.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a bit longer battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because it has a 4400mAh battery size. The Xiaomi Mi 9T shoots way better photos and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a back-facing camera with lot more MP and a bigger aperture to capture better low-light images and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.