Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-08-11 | 2019-08-20 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is slightly better than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, getting a 90.6 score against 82.7. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 construction is newer and a lot thinner than the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro's, but it's also incredibly heavier. These devices use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has newer 11 version while Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has Android 10.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a much lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of display. Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a way bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has more internal memory.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has 6 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has just a little better battery life than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has a 10 percent larger battery size.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro shoots greater pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a larger aperture for better images and videos in low-light environments and a camera in the back with a way higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.