Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-08-11 | 2019-07-24 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.04 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 6.13 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Blue, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 282 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.18 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4030mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is much better than Xiaomi Mi A3, getting a 90.6 score against 79.2. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a noticeably newer and extremely thinner device than the Xiaomi Mi A3, but it's notably heavier. Both of these devices use the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so both should count with the same OS features.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 has just a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi A3, because it has a way higher resolution of 1768 x 2208px, a bigger screen and a greater pixels density. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a bit better performance than Xiaomi Mi A3, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a little bit more memory for applications and games than Xiaomi Mi A3, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Mi A3 captures greater pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a back camera with much more mega pixels and a bigger aperture to capture better images in low light environments.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a bit better battery performance than Xiaomi Mi A3, because it has a 4400mAh battery capacity against 4030mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.