Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 12 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2022-06-23 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.43 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Moonlight Silver, Nebula Green and Night Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a bit better than the Xiaomi Poco F4, having a overall score of 90.6 against 87.5. Although the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is older and incredibly heavier than the Xiaomi Poco F4, it's construction is still thinner. Both phones in this review come with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has the previous 11 version and Xiaomi Poco F4 has Android 12.
Xiaomi Poco F4 has a better screen than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a little bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch in the display. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Poco F4, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
Xiaomi Poco F4 has a little faster CPU than Galaxy Z Fold 3, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Xiaomi Poco F4 features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a camera with way more megapixels and a bigger aperture to take better low-light photos.
Xiaomi Poco F4 counts with just a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.