Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2020-09-08 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a global score of 90.6, which is better than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC's score of 81.6. Galaxy Z Fold 3's construction is newer and a lot thinner than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC's, although it is also a lot heavier. These phones come with Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Fold 3 has the newer 11 version and Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has Android 10.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a quite smaller display and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixels amount per inch of screen. Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a way bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a little bit better performance than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a larger amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC takes a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a bigger camera aperture and a camera in the back with a lot better 64 MP resolution.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a 17% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.