Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2021-01-18 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.7 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 is better than the Xiaomi Redmi 9T, having a 90.6 score against 78.2. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 design is notably thinner but much heavier than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, and they were released only a few months apart. Both phones we compare here use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Z Fold 3 has the newer 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi 9T has Android 10, offering a lot of extra features and increased performance.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a bit faster processor than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 and Xiaomi Redmi 9T both feature incredibly similar displays, because although the Xiaomi Redmi 9T has a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little greater screen density.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a greater storage capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi 9T has a way better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a camera in the back with a lot better resolution and a larger aperture to capture better low-light photography.
The Xiaomi Redmi 9T has a way better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a 36% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.