Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-08-11 | -- |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Atlantic Blue, Graphite Gray and Polar White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, having a overall score of 90.6 against 77.1. Both phones in this comparison review use the same Android 11 operating system. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a notably thinner but noticeably heavier phone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a much better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has more RAM. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has a better screen than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel density and a slightly higher resolution of 2080 x 2400 pixels.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a little bit more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has a little longer battery performance than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a 14% greater battery size.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G features a lot better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a way more MP camera and a larger camera aperture to capture better low light captures and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.