Compare phones
Samsung Omnia W
I8350, I8350Motorola Moto E (2015)
XT1511XT1511
| Global Score | |
| 58.1 | 63.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Windows Phone 7.5 Mango | Android 5.0 |
| 2011-09-26 | 2015-02-25 |
| 4.57 x 2.31 x 0.43 inches | 5.11 x 2.63 x 0.48 inches |
| 4.07 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| -- | Black and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 175.00 | $ 140.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.7 inches | 4.5 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 540 x 960 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 252 pixels per inch | 245 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.3 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 chipset |
| Single-Core 1400 MHz processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A53 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 1 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 MP1 (320 MHz) GPU | Adreno 302 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 7.92 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 8 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.3 | 4.62 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution |
| 6.71 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| SIM | Micro SIM |
| 3.5 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2390mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 490 hours standby time 14 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 4.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto E (2015) is a little bit better than Samsung Omnia W, having a 63.4 score against 58.1. Moto E (2015)'s body is noticeably newer, but somewhat thicker and much heavier than Samsung Omnia W. Moto E (2015) comes with Android 5.0 operating system, while Samsung Omnia W has Windows Phone 7.5 Mango operating system.
Moto E (2015) has a more powerful CPU than Samsung Omnia W, because it has more RAM memory, a greater number of cores (although they are slower), a faster 400 MHz graphics co-processor and a 64 bits processor. Moto E (2015) has a little bit better display than Samsung Omnia W, because although it has a quite inferior pixel amount per display inch, it also counts with a bigger screen and a bit higher 960 x 540 resolution.
The Motorola Moto E (2015) has a better camera than Samsung Omnia W. Both have a 5 mega-pixels back camera, the same 1280x720 (HD) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates. Moto E (2015) counts with much more storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Omnia W, and although they both have the same 8 GB internal memory capacity, the Moto E (2015) also has an external memory slot that allows up to 32 GB.
The Motorola Moto E (2015) counts with a much better battery life than Samsung Omnia W, because it has 2390mAh of battery capacity instead of 1500mAh.
The Moto E (2015) not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to others, which makes buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.