Compare phones
Samsung Vibrant
SGH-T959| Global Score | |
| 55.4 | 60.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 2.2, 2.1 | Android 4.0.3, 2.3.4 |
| 2010-06-28 | 2011-10-31 |
| 4.82 x 2.54 x 0.39 inches | 5.07 x 2.64 x 0.44 inches |
| 4.16 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| -- | Black |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 280.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 4.5 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 540 x 960 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD |
| 233 pixels per inch | 245 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.6 | 7.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 3 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S3 APQ8060 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A8 (Single-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Scorpion (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor |
| -- | 1 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX540 (200 MHz) GPU | Adreno 220 (266 MHz) GPU |
| 7.38 | 8.01 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 5.72 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (60 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.27 | 7.48 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 4.1 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1620mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 450 hours standby time 6.5 hours talk time | 293 hours standby time 4.6 hours talk time |
| 3.28 | 3.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 3.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
HTC Raider 4G is a bit better than Samsung Vibrant, with a general score of 60.8 against 55.4. Although HTC Raider 4G is newer than the Samsung Vibrant, it is somewhat thicker and incredibly heavier. Both phones we are comparing here come with Android OS (operating system), but the HTC Raider 4G has newer 4.0.3 version while Samsung Vibrant has Android 2.2 version, so it provides the user a couple nice extra features.
Samsung Vibrant counts with a little more vivid screen than HTC Raider 4G, although it has a bit lower resolution of 800 x 480px, a quite smaller screen and a little worse pixel density. HTC Raider 4G has a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Vibrant, because it has a faster GPU working at 266 megahertz and a higher number of faster cores.
HTC Raider 4G has as much memory to install games and applications as the Samsung Vibrant, both of them have a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 32 GB and the same 16 GB internal memory capacity. The HTC Raider 4G has a better camera than Samsung Vibrant, because it has a lot higher 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality and a camera in the back with a much higher 8 mega pixels resolution.
The HTC Raider 4G features a bit better battery performance than Samsung Vibrant, because it has 1620mAh of battery capacity instead of 1500mAh.
The HTC Raider 4G is not only the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.