Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-09-30 |
| 4.74 x 2.40 x 0.59 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Metal | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.9 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1280 x 768 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 383 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 16.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.57 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 2.4 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 3.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X70 Pro is a little bit better than the Samsung W2016, having a 78.3 score against 72.2. The vivo X70 Pro design is extremely thinner but just a little bit heavier than the Samsung W2016. These devices work with Android operating system, but the vivo X70 Pro has the older 11 version and Samsung W2016 has Android 5.1 Lollipop version.
The vivo X70 Pro counts with a little better performance than Samsung W2016, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has 9 GB more RAM memory. The vivo X70 Pro has just a bit better looking display than Samsung W2016, because it has a lot higher 1080 x 2376px resolution, a just a little better screen density and a way larger screen.
The vivo X70 Pro captures much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung W2016, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the vivo X70 Pro also has a back-facing camera with a much better resolution, a larger diafragm aperture and better video frame rates. Vivo X70 Pro features a lot bigger storage for apps and games than Samsung W2016, because it has 192 GB more internal storage.
The vivo X70 Pro features a way better battery life than Samsung W2016, because it has 4450mAh of battery capacity against 2000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.