Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-10-02 |
| 5.03 x 2.42 x 0.62 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 525 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 2.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) is much better than Samsung W2017, with an 87 score against 73.2. Both devices we compare here have Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola razr (2020) has 11 version and Samsung W2017 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. Motorola razr (2020) is a extremely thinner and just a little bit lighter device than Samsung W2017.
Motorola razr (2020) counts with just a little better processing power than Samsung W2017, because it has a larger number of cores and a larger amount of RAM. The Samsung W2017 has a bit sharper screen than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 1920px and a higher quantity of pixels per inch of display.
Motorola razr (2020) counts with a lot bigger memory to store more apps and games than Samsung W2017, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal storage. Motorola razr (2020) features better battery duration than Samsung W2017, because it has a 2800mAh battery size against 2300mAh.
Motorola razr (2020) has a very superior camera than Samsung W2017, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a same size camera aperture, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a camera in the back with way more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.