Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2019-12-27 |
| 5.03 x 2.42 x 0.62 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 525 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 2.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 has a score of 85.5, which is better than the Samsung W2017's general score of 73.2. Galaxy A51's design is notably thinner and lighter than the Samsung W2017. Both devices we are comparing here come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A51 has 11 version and Samsung W2017 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
Galaxy A51 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung W2017, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Galaxy A51 also has a larger number of cores. The Samsung W2017 counts with just a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A51, because although it has a lot smaller screen and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 1920, it also counts with a greater pixel count per screen inch.
Galaxy A51 has a lot better camera than Samsung W2017, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A51 also counts with a much more MP back facing camera. The Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with a much greater memory to install applications and games than Samsung W2017, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy A51 features a much longer battery lifetime than Samsung W2017, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 2300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.