Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| -- | 2013-09-04 |
| 5.03 x 2.42 x 0.62 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 525 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| -- | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 2.4 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 4.24 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 is better than the Samsung W2017, with a overall score of 81.2 against 73.2. Galaxy Note 3 is a lighter and a lot thinner phone than Samsung W2017. These devices work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Note 3 has an older 5.0 version while Samsung W2017 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a little better performance than Samsung W2017, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, and they both have 4 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 also counts with an extra graphics processor. Galaxy Note 3 features a slightly better looking screen than Samsung W2017, because although it has a much lower display pixels density, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1920 x 1080, the Galaxy Note 3 also counts with a much bigger screen.
Samsung W2017 has a bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory, the Samsung W2017 also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 256 GB. Galaxy Note 3 counts with a bit better camera than Samsung W2017, because although it has a lot tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy Note 3 also counts with a camera in the back with a higher 13 mega pixels resolution.
The Galaxy Note 3 counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Samsung W2017, because it has a 39% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.