Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-03-06 |
| 5.03 x 2.42 x 0.62 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 525 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 has an overall score of 94.8, which is a lot better than the Samsung W2017's 73.2 score. The Galaxy S20 is a lighter and noticeably thinner cellphone than the Samsung W2017. These phones work with Android OS, but the Galaxy S20 has the previous 13 version while Samsung W2017 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version.
Galaxy S20 counts with a little bit better processing power than Samsung W2017, because it has a greater number of cores (and also faster) and more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S20 features a bit more vivid display than Samsung W2017, because it has a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px, a just a bit greater amount of pixels in each inch in the display and a lot larger screen.
The Galaxy S20 captures much better photographs and videos than Samsung W2017, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for low light captures and videos, and they both have the same resolution back-facing camera, the Galaxy S20 also counts with a lot better 7680x4320 video definition.
The Galaxy S20 has much more memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung W2017, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB and more internal storage. Galaxy S20 features a much longer battery lifetime than Samsung W2017, because it has a 74% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.