Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-03-06 |
| 5.03 x 2.42 x 0.62 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.2 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 525 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a score of 98, which is a lot better than the Samsung W2017's global score of 73.2. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a a little heavier but noticeably thinner device than the Samsung W2017. These phones have Android OS, but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has 13 version while Samsung W2017 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a little sharper display than Samsung W2017, because although it has a little bit lower number of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a way larger screen and a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3200. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much greater memory to install applications and games than Samsung W2017, because it has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a little bit better performance than Samsung W2017, because it has a larger number of cores (and faster) and a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G shoots greater pictures and videos than Samsung W2017, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low light images and video, it also counts with a back facing camera with way more megapixels and a way better video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a way better battery lifetime than Samsung W2017, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.