Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 13, 12 |
| -- | 2022-02-25 |
| 5.03 x 2.42 x 0.62 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 525 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.4 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is way better than Samsung W2017, getting a global score of 95.4 against 73.2. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has the older 13 version and Samsung W2017 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a much thinner but a little heavier phone than the Samsung W2017.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a bit better processor than Samsung W2017, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores (and they are faster). Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a more vivid display than Samsung W2017, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a lot larger screen and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3088.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra takes a lot better photos and videos than Samsung W2017, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a much higher video resolution and a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels. Samsung W2017 features a bit bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 256 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a way better battery performance than Samsung W2017, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.