Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| -- | 2018-03-16 |
| 5.03 x 2.42 x 0.62 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 525 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.24 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S9 has an overall score of 83.3, which is much better than the Samsung W2017's 73.2 overall score. Galaxy S9 is a a lot lighter and way thinner cellphone than the Samsung W2017. Samsung Galaxy S9 features just a bit better looking display than Samsung W2017, because it has a quite better display density, a lot higher 1440 x 2960 resolution and a way larger screen.
Galaxy S9 counts with a bit superior processor than Samsung W2017, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Galaxy S9 also has a greater number of cores. Galaxy S9 counts with just a bit bigger memory to install applications and games than Samsung W2017, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Galaxy S9 also has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 400 GB.
Galaxy S9 shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung W2017, and although they both have a 12 megapixels back camera and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy S9 also has a bigger diafragm aperture and faster 60 frames per second video frame rate. Samsung Galaxy S9 features superior battery performance than Samsung W2017, because it has a 30% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.