Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 50.7 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| bada | -- |
| 2010-10-04 | 2018-08-29 |
| 4.88 x 2.35 x 0.46 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.76 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and Red |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 399.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| Super Clear LCD | IPS LCD |
| 252 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 3 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A8 (Single-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| -- | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX540 (200 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 7.38 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 1.32 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.27 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 620 hours standby time 13.8 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is much better than the Samsung Wave II, getting an 85.5 score against 50.7. Xiaomi Pocophone F1's design is a lot newer and notably thinner than Samsung Wave II's, but it is also incredibly heavier. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a better looking display than Samsung Wave II, because it has a much better pixels density, a lot larger display and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2246.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a much powerful processor than Samsung Wave II, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with a larger number of cores. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has much more memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Wave II, because it has an external SD slot that holds up to 256 GB.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 shoots greater pictures and videos than Samsung Wave II, because it has a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a way better 12 megapixels resolution back-facing camera. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a much better battery performance than Samsung Wave II, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 1500mAh.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 costs a little more than Samsung Wave II, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.