Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 54 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| Android 4.0, 2.3.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2011-08-31 | 2020-08-20 |
| 4.92 x 2.48 x 0.34 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 4.13 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gray, Pink and White | Just black |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 359.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 480 x 854 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 233 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S2 MSM8255 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Scorpion (Single-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB (333 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 205 (245 MHz) GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 7.92 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 1 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 2.72 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 8.10 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.82 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3.9 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Li-Ion Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 460 hours standby time 7.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 1.36 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a is way better than the Sony Ericsson Xperia Arc S, with an 82.9 score against 54. Even though Google Pixel 4a is heavier than Sony Ericsson Xperia Arc S, it's just a little bit thinner and a lot newer. Both devices in our current comparison have Android OS (operating system), but the Google Pixel 4a has a newer 11 version while Sony Ericsson Xperia Arc S has Android 4.0.
Google Pixel 4a counts with a quite superior performance than Sony Ericsson Xperia Arc S, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with more RAM and more cpu cores. The Google Pixel 4a features just a bit better looking display than Sony Ericsson Xperia Arc S, because it has a lot greater pixels density, a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a way bigger screen.
Google Pixel 4a shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Sony Ericsson Xperia Arc S, because it has a much bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light images, a lot more mega pixels back-facing camera and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality. Google Pixel 4a features a superior storage for applications and games than Sony Ericsson Xperia Arc S, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory.
The Google Pixel 4a counts with a much better battery performance than Sony Ericsson Xperia Arc S.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Google Pixel 4a is also cheaper than the Sony Ericsson Xperia Arc S, making it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.