Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-22 | 2016-07-28 |
| 6.54 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black and Purple | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3840 x 1644 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 643 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 18.58 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia 1 II is much better than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, with a global score of 91 against 76.4. The Xperia 1 II body is newer, but a little bit thicker and a little bit heavier than the Moto Z Force Droid Edition. The Xperia 1 II counts with a little better performance than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has 4 GB more RAM memory and a larger number of cores.
Xperia 1 II has a slightly better looking display than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a better 1644 x 3840px resolution, a bigger display and a little bit greater display density. Xperia 1 II captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has a worse (4K) video resolution and a camera in the back with a lot worse 12 MP resolution, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light photos and videos.
Xperia 1 II has a way bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has a SD extension slot that holds 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal memory. Xperia 1 II counts with a little better battery performance than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.