Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-10-20 |
| -- | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 449 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snpadragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 710 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,46 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 16.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s is better than Xperia 10 VI, having an 86.6 score against 73.2. Both devices we are comparing use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A50s has an older 10 version while Xperia 10 VI has Android 14. Galaxy A50s counts with a lot better performance than Xperia 10 VI, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Galaxy A50s has just a bit better looking display than Sony Xperia 10 VI, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a just a little lower pixels number per screen inch, it also counts with a bit larger display. Samsung Galaxy A50s has a much better camera than Sony Xperia 10 VI, although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low light photos, they both have a same size sensor and a same resolution camera in the back.
Xperia 10 VI features a greater memory for applications and games than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Xperia 10 VI also has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1,46 TB. Xperia 10 VI features longer battery performance than Galaxy A50s, because it has a 25 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.