Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-03-06 |
| -- | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 449 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snpadragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 710 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,46 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 16.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a global score of 98, which is much better than Xperia 10 VI's score of 73.2. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the previous 13 version and Xperia 10 VI has Android 14. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an extremely better processor than Xperia 10 VI, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has 4 GB more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much better screen than Xperia 10 VI, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3200px, a quite better pixels quantity per inch in the screen and a quite bigger display. The Sony Xperia 10 VI features a bit bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Sony Xperia 10 VI also has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1,46 TB.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's battery duration is just as good as Xperia 10 VI's battery life. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a greater camera than Xperia 10 VI, and although they both have the same back camera sensor size and a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a camera with a much higher 108 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.