Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-04-14 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.18 x 2.68 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black, Green and Pink | Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | -- |
| 449 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.89 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia 5 III is much better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, having a general score of 90.5 against 80.1. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS (operating system), but the Xperia 5 III has 11 version while Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo. Xperia 5 III is a newer cellphone, and it is also noticeably lighter and thinner than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro.
Xperia 5 III features a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Xperia 5 III also has 4 GB more RAM. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit sharper screen than Xperia 5 III, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel quantity in each inch of screen and a slightly better 1440 x 2560px resolution.
The Sony Xperia 5 III takes much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for capturing pictures and videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same resolution back camera, the Sony Xperia 5 III also counts with a much higher (4K) video quality and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Xperia 5 III counts with a superior storage for games and applications than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has an external SD slot that allows up to 1 TB and more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro's battery lifetime is very similar to the Sony Xperia 5 III one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.