Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2019-10-02 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.22 x 2.68 x 0.32 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Grey and Red | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 848.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | TFT |
| 449 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A32 has a global score of 84.7, which is a little bit better than the Xperia 5's score of 81. The Samsung Galaxy A32 design is newer than Xperia 5's, but it's extremely heavier and thicker. The Xperia 5 has a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xperia 5 also has 2 GB more RAM.
The Sony Xperia 5 has a more vivid screen than Galaxy A32, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a way better 1080 x 2520 pixels resolution and a lot higher pixels amount per screen inch. Xperia 5 counts with a little bit better memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A32, because although it has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy A32 counts with a much better camera than Sony Xperia 5, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Galaxy A32 also counts with a way more mega pixels back camera. The Samsung Galaxy A32 has a way better battery performance than Sony Xperia 5, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.