Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 63.9 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.4.3, 4.4.2, 4.3 | Android 10 |
| 2014-01-14 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.50 x 3.30 x 0.30 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.08 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 285.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 245 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon MSM8928 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 305 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.55 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.62 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 1.10 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.81 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 1071 hours standby time 14 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has an overall score of 81.1, which is a lot better than the Xperia T2 Ultra's 63.9 global score. Both devices in this comparison have Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has older 10 version and Xperia T2 Ultra has Android 4.4.3. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a a lot newer phone than Xperia T2 Ultra, but it is heavier and thicker.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a little sharper screen than Xperia T2 Ultra, because it has a way better 1080 x 2400 resolution, a quite larger screen and a much better display pixels density. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a bit superior processing unit than Xperia T2 Ultra, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM memory and a larger number of cores (and also faster).
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than Sony Xperia T2 Ultra, because it has 64 GB internal storage and a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a much better camera than Xperia T2 Ultra, because it has a lot bigger aperture to capture better low-light photos and videos, a way higher (4K) video quality and a camera in the back with way more mega pixels.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a really longer battery duration than Sony Xperia T2 Ultra, because it has a 67% bigger battery size.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro costs a bit more money than the Sony Xperia T2 Ultra, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.