Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 72.9 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2016-05-23 | 2013-09-04 |
| 5.63 x 2.72 x 0.30 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Pink and White |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 205.00 | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 8956 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2620mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 4.56 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is better than the Sony Xperia X, getting a overall score of 81.2 against 72.9. Even being the best device in this comparison, it must be told that it is also noticeably older, just a little thicker and a little heavier. Galaxy Note 3 counts with a little faster CPU than Sony Xperia X, because although it has 2 less cpu cores (although faster), and they both have 3 GB of RAM, the Galaxy Note 3 also counts with an additional graphics processor.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has just a bit better looking display than Xperia X, because although it has a little lower pixel density, and they both have the same exact 1920 x 1080px resolution, the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 also counts with a quite larger display. The Xperia X has just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same video quality, the Xperia X also has a much bigger back camera sensor taking much higher quality videos and photos, higher 60 frames per second video frame rate, a larger aperture for better low-light captures and video and a back-facing camera with way more mega-pixels.
Galaxy Note 3 has a greater storage for applications and games than Sony Xperia X, because although it has an external memory card slot that admits 136 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has improved battery duration than Sony Xperia X, because it has a 22% bigger battery size.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 costs more money than the Sony Xperia X, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.