Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.9 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-05-23 | 2020-09-18 |
| 5.63 x 2.72 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 205.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 8956 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2620mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a lot better than the Sony Xperia X, having a 94.6 score against 72.9. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2's body is newer and a bit thinner, but noticeably heavier than Sony Xperia X. The Xperia X counts with a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a way worse resolution of 1080 x 1920 and a lot smaller display, it also counts with a little higher screen pixel density.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xperia X, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a quite better performance than Xperia X, because it has a higher amount of RAM and 2 more processing cores.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a very superior battery performance than Sony Xperia X, because it has a 72% more battery capacity. Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit better camera than Sony Xperia X, because although it has a back facing camera with a way worse 12 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a much larger camera sensor taking lot better quality videos and photos, a bigger aperture to take better images and video in poorly lited environments and a much higher video quality.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Xperia X, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Xperia X. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy the Xperia X, and give up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.